On June 18 and 23, the City of Greater
Geelong (CoGG) ran two
information and consultation sessions at Drysdale's Senior Citizens centre to gauge local reaction to its Draft Drysdale Urban
Development Framework (DDUDF).
Each two-hour session attracted around fifty local people. Consulting stakeholders and incorporating their views is essential to
the development of an Urban Design Framework, which combines a
strategic plan for an area with detailed/practical designs for the
plan's implementation. The Draft Drysdale Urban Development Framework
is a result of an 'Enquiry by Design' process - two days of
consultation with local people (including DCSCA representatives) in
December 2011 and the subsequent consultants' report. CoGG received the
consultants' report in Febuary 2012 and published its DDUDF in June
2012.
Consistent concerns
The
June meetings showed that local people have consistent concerns about
their town's future. Not everyone at these meetings had attended the December
consultations, but nonetheless the concerns expressed on the three
occasions were very similar. People are concerned that heavy traffic is
spoiling the town's character and heritage. They pointed out that
concentration of services at the town's centre means that as it
expands, it's less possible for people to walk to and from the town
centre; and in the absence of swift and convenient public transport
(e.g. a 'smart' bus service), people have no option but to drive into
town. Increasing traffic increases the demand for parking space and
while new developments (e.g. Drysdale's new Aldi supermarket) must
include some car parking, this isn't enough to compensate for
Drysdale's growing role as a shopping centre for the north Bellarine.
The Draft Framework proposes to alleviate traffic stress by making
the High Street-Murradoc Road roundabout into a traffic
light-controlled junction and
diffusing traffic away from it by
creating new linking roads (e.g. between Collins Street and Murradoc
Road); and it proposes to make Murradoc Road more attractive by, for
example, creating a service road
in front of the current light industrial units, landscaping both sides
of the road, installing proper footpaths and encouraging 'al fresco'
dining near Aldi. The Framework seeks to retain Drysdale's heritage and
character as a rural village and to enhance it through sensitive
placement of street furniture, public art and indigenous plants. It
also proposes imaginative improvements to the town, such as creating a
permanent Farmers' Market between the side entrance of the Safeways
complex and the shops opposite; and making any expansion of Safeways
contingent on the
development of a 'civic centre' that would face the green - but not
encroach on it; and ensuring that new buildings face their streets, not
back onto
them.
Deadline extended
Several people were concerned at the short period of time in which
people could submit their views on the DDUDF to the council. The
deadline is 29 June and while this is a month after CoGG published the
document, it's only a week or so after the information sessions. In
response, the CoGG officers extended the deadline by two weeks to 13
July.
... and the Drysdale bypass??
The council had asked the 'Enquiry by Design' consultants to create a
draft 'Masterplan'
for the town centre, thereby excluding any consideration of the
proposed
Drysdale bypass. However, during the December consultations, local
people insisted that
any discussion about the town centre must include the issue of the
bypass; and people at the June meetings saw a bleak future for
Drysdale's town centre unless a bypass removes some of its through
traffic.
A Drysdale bypass would relieve traffic congestion and increase
pedestrian safety. Further, a bypass linked with the eastern end of
Murradoc Road would improve transport links to Geelong and Melbourne,
make that part of town more attractive to new
businesses. This would boost the local economy, stemming the flow of
wealth and talent from our town and preventing it from becoming just a
'dormitory town' for Geelong and Melbourne.
Many of those at the meetings wanted to be part of the DCSCA-led
campaign for a Drysdale bypass and heard that DCSCA will contact them
about the campaign so far and how they can help.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Local people plan central Drysdale
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment